Dimension: Risk factors start consumption
Area
Personal
Specificity
Unspecified: Legal and illegal drugs
Year
1975
Author
Gambrill & Richey
Gambrill, Eileen.
University of California, Berkeley
Oficina: Haviland Hall 207
Teléfono: (510) 642-4450
E-mail: gambrill@berkeley.edu
Year
1995
Validation Country
Spain
Author
Comeche, Díaz, & Vallejo
Author Contact Data
Comeche, María Isabel.
Dpto. Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamientos Psicológicos. Facultad de Psicología UNED. C/ Juan del Rosal, 10 Madrid (España).
E-mail: mcomeche@psi.uned.es
References
Comeche, M. I., Díaz, M. I., & Vallejo, M. A. (1995). Cuestionarios, inventarios y escalas: Ansiedad, depresión y habilidades sociales. Madrid (UNED).
Year
2010
Validation Country
Mexico
Author
Castaños, Reyes, Rivera, & Díaz
Author Contact Data
Castaños, Susana.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Col. San Jerónimo Lídice, calle Ocotepec 34-2, C.P. 10200, México, D.F. Teléfono: (5255) 56810147.
E-mail: susycc84@gmail.com
References
Castaños, S., Reyes, I., Rivera, S., & Díaz, R. (2010). Estandarización del Inventario de Asertividad de Gambrill y Richey-II. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación, 1, 27-50.
Year
2014
Validation Country
Spain
Author
Casas, Prat, Vilamala, Escandell, García-Franco, Martin, López, & Ochoa
Author Contact Data
Casas-Anguera, Emma.
Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu. C/ Doctor Antoni Pujades, 42. 08830 Sant Boi de Llobregat. Barcelona (España).
E-mail: ecasas@pssjd.org
References
Casas-Anguera, E., Prat, G., Vilamala, S., Escandell, M. J., Garcia-Franco, M., Martin, J. R., López, E., & Ochoa, S. (2014). Validación de la versión española del Inventario de Asertividad Gambrill y Richey en población con diagnóstico de esquizofrenia. Anales de Psicología, 30, 431-437.
AI is an effective tool for measuring change through the assessment of assertive competences and abilities. Eight individual factors are measured through through a total of 40 items
The test-retest reliability coefficient of the original version was .87 for the grade of discomfort subscale and .81 for probability of response. In other studies, the factor structure obtained was consistent with the categories that make up the reagents (Castaños et al., 2010). Also, following Casas et al. (2014) adequate measures of convergent validity and divergent validity were obtained with other scales of social functioning
Two different scores of the discomfort scale and the probability of response scale are obtained with an oscillating range between 40 and 200. Although a high score indicates greater severity of the problem, in the first scale a high score would indicate a high degree of discomfort while in the second it would indicate low probability of response
Gambrill, D. E. & Richey, C. A. (1975). An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behavioral Therapy, 6, 550-561.